From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 15 13:07:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA09724 for current-outgoing; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 13:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (sc-gw.StevesCafe.com [205.168.119.191]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA09713 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 13:07:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA18284 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 14:07:40 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199703152107.OAA18284@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> X-Authentication-Warning: Ilsa.StevesCafe.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 From: Steve Passe To: current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: current-digest V3 #40 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 15 Mar 1997 12:17:34 PST." <199703152017.MAA07561@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 14:07:40 -0700 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, >] Have you checked this yet? >] >] http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html > >Thanks, that was the information I was looking for :-) > >Now I've followed the instructions on configuring an SMP kernel and >successfully bootet it, it seems that the machine is slower than >before while running on one processor only... any Ideas regarding that? because you are paying all the penalties for scheduling 2 CPUs without getting any of the benefits (ie a 2nd CPU to schedule!) I suggest you move this thread to smp@freebsd.org -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD