From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 14 20:18:17 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E459416A4CF
	for <gnome@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:18:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web53602.mail.yahoo.com (web53602.mail.yahoo.com
	[206.190.37.35])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4025E43D46
	for <gnome@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:18:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scott@sremick.net)
Received: (qmail 79144 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2005 20:18:16 -0000
Message-ID: <20050114201816.79142.qmail@web53602.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.213.7.6] by web53602.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:18:16 PST
X-RocketYMMF: siremick
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:18:16 -0800 (PST)
From: "Scott I. Remick" <scott@sremick.net>
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>,
	Linus Nordberg <linus@nordberg.se>
In-Reply-To: <41E8262E.9040508@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: textproc/libxslt depending on libxml >= 2.6.15
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: scott@sremick.net
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:18:18 -0000


--- Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> The dependencies ARE correct. When you upgrade individual ports, 
> portupgrade only attempts to upgrade the ports you specify. When you run 
> 'portupgrade -a' -- which is how you should be administering your 
> installed ports -- it upgrades everything in the correct order. 
> portupgrade it a pretty intelligent tool, but if you tell it to only 
> perform certain operations (e.g., portupgrade libxslt), it will not be 
> using its full power (e.g., realizing that libxml2 needs to be upgraded 
> first).

Would "portupgrade -R libxslt" accomplish this?