Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:30:56 +0200
From:      Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r195918 - head/sys/netinet
Message-ID:  <20090729053056.GC3550@garage.freebsd.pl>
In-Reply-To: <354E0657-DC37-4493-8E17-D09B257B5A28@lakerest.net>
References:  <200907281409.n6SE971u034585@svn.freebsd.org> <20090729051016.GB3550@garage.freebsd.pl> <354E0657-DC37-4493-8E17-D09B257B5A28@lakerest.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--qjNfmADvan18RZcF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:23:24AM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote:
> >Instead of using additional argument to the sctp_add_to_readq()
> >function, wouldn't it be sufficient to just check with mtx_owned(9) if
> >the lock is already held?
>=20
> Hmm... I suppose one could go that way... but traditionally upper code =
=20
> as
> told the lower code that it holds/does not hold the lock. This is true
> in quite a few other functions...

We can find examples of both behaviours in many places, that's true.
The reason to keep additional argument is that once you decide to move
to read-write locks it might not be reliable to check if read-lock is
already held by the current thread.

All in all both solutions work, my observation was only that diff could
be significantly reduced by using mtx_owned(9), nothing major.

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--qjNfmADvan18RZcF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFKb96QForvXbEpPzQRAojyAJ9tCSLHEaovLIDI5QylnxwIl0VKvACg+Cty
AG6WF5UCdcAEE6i+01J2NSs=
=q126
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qjNfmADvan18RZcF--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090729053056.GC3550>