From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 8 11:52:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA15267 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zed.ludd.luth.se (zed.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA15234 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from father.ludd.luth.se (father.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.18]) by zed.ludd.luth.se (8.7.5/8.7.2) with ESMTP id UAA20509; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 20:50:49 +0200 From: Tomas Klockar Received: (dateck@localhost) by father.ludd.luth.se (8.6.11/8.6.11) id UAA01294; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 20:50:48 +0200 Message-Id: <199610081850.UAA01294@father.ludd.luth.se> Subject: Re: apache under FreeBSD better than under Linux? To: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph Kukulies) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 20:50:47 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199610081357.OAA17428@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> from Christoph Kukulies at "Oct 8, 96 02:57:40 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL15 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Christoph Kukulies: > > Could someone give me some arguments, what I could tell a person > who is having problems with httpd under Linux, why FreeBSD and the apache > httpd is a better choice? > > One argument could be tha SYN flood countermeasures in the present SNAP. > Other comments? > I think FreeBSD hav better network code then Linux in general. /Tomas -- Tomas Klockar can be found at the following adresses: Vänortsvägen 9:164 | Furuvägen 102 | dateck@ludd.luth.se 977 54 Luleå | 871 52 Härnösand | dateck@solace.mh.se Tel: +46-920-224775 | Tel: +46-611-13393 | d94-tkl@sm.luth.se