From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 10:14:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF641065674 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CC18FC20 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so427379iwn.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:14:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cfKTsY/3n6uk4KYErD9L0vTZltwqaZwGmlbW8JFzh3M=; b=neOPeH1s2LfJkm9iR5ohqUkQzWwnzK86is7gO0Ue6HQr2qwdgZm6J59E/j9N3exOcm QQgy/QKfgie8gEknJLHWgLnI9/5USGNhaPdnbgpRw9sKgwuOOttHW+XR65soN1K7BZWl LtgLnVUD43qi5wzq1wtLm3X5LrLjD1mJmIahI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=b7DdqdzQLD2sr8Q9f5P3NEyycW47U6OGlJH/a4RErODDx7KBkYNuhdRjGTqxijoRCZ JAf5R26TFvJ95lQK5dSxdj2JXdd9NxvPDfXet5YvDGlhCek9bHheP8bnTnOKN4MFrTN+ IOHTAxCw6Oa7BEYDcCJrpUFlZQqqwzxlqBjYg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.154.73 with SMTP id n9mr10226131ibw.10.1283422487975; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.146.10 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 03:14:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86d3swmpjz.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86bp8h5mn6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86d3swmpjz.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 03:14:47 -0700 Message-ID: From: Xin LI To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /stand/camcontrol X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:14:53 -0000 2010/9/2 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav : > Xin LI writes: >> My 2 cents: I think we don't really need to care about the size for >> rescue binary after the splitfs VFS layer have been introduced to >> libstand? =C2=A0Build of release split MFSROOT was 2006-ish and I feel t= hat >> this can be gone. > > This is /stand, not /rescue; /rescue has a full camcontrol. Oh you are right. But MFSROOT have /stand (for sysinstall), not /rescue, I think? Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net