From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 08:03:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8CB1065672; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:03:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6848FC14; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA24351; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:03:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OuhWi-000FhE-Pj; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:03:04 +0300 Message-ID: <4C8C8938.4030500@icyb.net.ua> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:03:04 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100822 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norikatsu Shigemura References: <20100912014855.984a89ed.nork@FreeBSD.org> <4C8BCAC5.5050008@root.org> <20100912081409.9f4d74d0.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100912081409.9f4d74d0.nork@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Nate Lawson Subject: Re: CPU C-state storange on Panasonic TOUGH BOOK CF-R9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:03:07 -0000 on 12/09/2010 02:14 Norikatsu Shigemura said the following: > According to acpidump -dt, I could find CPU0CST table, but > not found _CST. > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Scope (\) > { > Name (SSDT, Package (0x0C) > { > : > "CPU0CST ", > 0xDA9AB618, > 0x000005CD, > : > }) > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Hum... ACPI CA 20100806 has a bug? How do you conclude? Does a different version work? It seems that our acpidump doesn't dump a dynamically loaded table. That the table was loaded we can see from these messages: ACPI: Dynamic OEM Table Load: ACPI: SSDT 0 005CD (v01 PmRef Cpu0Cst 00003001 INTL 20061109) -- Andriy Gapon