From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 29 7: 6:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2680637B400 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blade-runner.mit.edu (BLADE-RUNNER.MIT.EDU [18.78.0.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB3E43E75 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:06:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from petr@blade-runner.mit.edu) Received: from blade-runner.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blade-runner.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7TEASnY030196; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:10:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from petr@blade-runner.mit.edu) Received: (from petr@localhost) by blade-runner.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7TEAShK030193; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:10:28 -0400 (EDT) To: "Perry E. Metzger" Cc: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" , mipam@ibb.net, Matthias Buelow , Stefan =?iso-8859-1?q?Kr=FCger?= , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, tech-security@netbsd.org, misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd) References: <20020828200748.90964.qmail@mail.com> <3D6D3953.6090005@mukappabeta.de> <20020828224330.GE249@localhost> <87k7mamc2s.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <20020829091232.A53344@mail.webmonster.de> <87bs7ln66u.fsf@snark.piermont.com> From: Petr Swedock Date: 29 Aug 2002 10:10:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bs7ln66u.fsf@snark.piermont.com> Message-ID: <86hehdbvsb.fsf@blade-runner.mit.edu> Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Perry E. Metzger" writes: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" writes: > > I would have thought spending at least hundreds of millions off > dollars and (as importantly) at least months of time would have been > considered "unattractive" enough to encourage other methods of getting > at your data like breaking in to your physical location. Silly me. I > guess I missed the concept behind crypto. The concept behind crypto is to confuse, scramble and obfuscate. When it was first designed for and employed in computers the existing mathematical models, computer muscle and modes of analysis were thought to assure unbreakability. Now the use has morphed into a race condition where present mathematical models and future computer muscle, coupled with existing modes of analysis are thought to assure breakability. Peace, Petr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message