Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 21:31:33 +0200 From: Oliver Brandmueller <ob@e-Gitt.NET> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-STABLE, ZFS, NFS, ggatec - suspected memory leak Message-ID: <20120401193133.GI65313@e-Gitt.NET> In-Reply-To: <4F761F4B.90409@p6m7g8.com> References: <20120330083830.GB65313@e-Gitt.NET> <4F761F4B.90409@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:02:03PM +0000, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-March/239643.ht= ml >=20 > Same issue different thread. Different software. >=20 > Its not NFS, its ZFS. >=20 > I don't really have a place to try it on 8.2, but my hunch from things > I've done rather similarly which don't cause tell me its a new issue in > 9.0, though I won't swear by that. Just digging around I find one value ever-growing in vmstat -z and being=20 by far the biggest "USED" value: virgin# while ( 1 ) while? echo -n `date`: ; vmstat -z | fgrep NAMEI | sed 's/ */ /g' while? sleep 10 while? end Sun Apr 1 21:26:33 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9150656, 1152,288542469, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:26:43 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9150877, 1187,288546408, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:26:53 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9150966, 1226,288549358, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:27:03 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9151079, 1241,288551944, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:27:13 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9151264, 1184,288555091, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:27:23 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9151338, 1238,288557632, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:27:33 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9151488, 1344,288560345, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:27:43 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9151610, 1350,288563532, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:27:53 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9151765, 1451,288567086, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:28:03 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9151935, 1409,288570645, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:28:13 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9152086, 1258,288573371, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:28:23 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9152244, 1100,288576862, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:28:33 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9152429, 1171,288580235, 0, 0 Sun Apr 1 21:28:43 CEST 2012:NAMEI: 1024, 0, 9152615, 1113,288583356, 0, 0 I'll recheck that in more busy times again. Philip: Are you using: - another file system (like UFS/FFS for the system or similar?) - ZFS snapshots - ZFS send on the system? Can you also see the NAMEI growth? - Oliver --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ ob@sysadm.in | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk94rRUACgkQiqtMdzjafymTRgCfcS1IHVM5WENQyzPXIWNTHGqw 1xAAnjkZqjWzupGieC9V3Eg3Tai6n3yV =bPz9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120401193133.GI65313>