Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:38:02 +0000 From: Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org> To: Beech Rintoul <beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Alex Samorukov <samm@os2.kiev.ua>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp/proftpd - Need some advice Message-ID: <20061115193801.GE2277@charon.picobyte.net> In-Reply-To: <200611151012.51248.beech@alaskaparadise.com> References: <200611151012.51248.beech@alaskaparadise.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:12:49AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: >=20 > Yesterday, I approved a patch rolled by "Alex Samorukov" <samm@os2.kiev.u= a>=20 > which fixes a buffer overflow vulnerability (ports/105510). I tested the= =20 > patch in 5.4, 6-STABLE and -CURRENT and didn't see any problems. >=20 > This morning I had a couple of emails from people telling me that after= =20 > upgrade they can't connect and the port is exiting with signal 11. >=20 > How should I proceed with this? as I said I can't duplicate the problem. >=20 I got a number of messages too, since I committed the patch. I was able to determine the cause of the problem, so I went ahead and fixed it. Shaun --=20 Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson --JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFFW2yZkmhdCGs4epoRAsXFAJ9TunVMtFb2basMwin/CFoa2lKlJQCYyzwW IdyEwgEiXPlh31oPxRxspg== =iOOp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061115193801.GE2277>