From owner-cvs-all Mon Apr 8 1:31:54 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238B537B41A; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 01:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA24852; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 18:31:48 +1000 Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 18:31:51 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: "David O'Brien" Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1obj Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus Makefile In-Reply-To: <20020408004154.A66483@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: <20020408180314.Y6180-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:04:01PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > However, in the special case of the large first passes of > > cc, we (people who set NOSHARED here previously) think that clobbering > > earlier settings is right, because the space savings are small and the > > time savings are large for using NOSHARED unconditionally. > > My reason for a static cc/cpp0/cc1 has nothing to do with speed, but > rather to allow one to recover from a bad libc.so or ld-elf.so.1. Your change from NOSHARED=yes to NOSHARED?=yes had a negative effect on this. NOSHARED=yes is a speed optimization for the global setting of NOSHARED=no. It happens to give the negative optimization for foot- shooting that you want (but this doesn't help much when /bin/sh is optimized for foot-shooting). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message