From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Jul 25 17:19:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from drago.cert.org.tw (drago.cert.org.tw [140.117.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903B514CBA; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 17:19:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from foxfair@drago.cert.org.tw) Received: from foxfair (foxfair.cc.nsysu.edu.tw [140.117.100.101]) by drago.cert.org.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA06793; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:19:06 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:17:11 +0800 From: Foxfair Hu To: sada@FreeBSD.org Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/12794: FAQ entry about a problem for lack of ld.so. Message-Id: <379BA907190.9458FOXFAIR@drago.cert.org.tw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.04 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun Jul 25 23:46:40 1999, you wrote: >Please check the ERRATA info carefully. >Nothing about compat22 is reported on it. Actually I think this information can be found in 3.1-R && 3.2-R's ERRTA. Your PR just implied "Some 3.x users could have trouble of missing ld.so" but it is not true. The truth is 3.1-R lacked with (aout) ld.so , you need to install compat22 distribution; and 3.2-R missed its installation directory from /usr/lib/compat(right place) to /usr/lib/compat/aout(wrong place). Those file in /usr/lib/compat now should be ELF format. I don't think it is necessary to include these information to FAQ. You can check it out from the errata file of every release version. And I encourage people to do so. Ref: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/fooR/errata.html Oh yeah, the "foo" word here is 3.[1-2], as your wish. >Also, please refine my FAQ entry > anyone >I'm sorry I could write poor English. Cheers, -Foxfair. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message