From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 05:16:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AC1106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EAA8FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so300924qwj.13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:16:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=PYuJ6K4Jtx60mz5glxZ/TedAWVvsiHlzYkSxcdqPAVE=; b=Vu2NZMM6Qxuz/ZkJ8GXcIxpSjShpR4wwwv3/ULSY88WLc8IrLXyeqQpMVxM+v/lCry Om6AXqTmIKk9+lZmb22vv/N4my9wE2xsrgv1ItGhKS3alZNuCJ/uPoHH01s4+SgRqqT4 Jrm+oIVPsAjKzEdhVfrrQi2c7Fk1GvIBqmre0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; b=uxWDbBeivdbH480rxUFjTCRi3nR3BSgq/Uq47SVSDOgnYFlsQLoTrSWuVdEiAC8N+d vUl3TMlzjTtmSvByZrALXl5FDQlOxjcsE5ZIABzl/aQoZVlHN4iZ7wvB0vyapP6Y0dVf U0oze1kCduCV/YMJM5VEsc6Svh0GFPOIUUzBo= Received: by 10.229.224.79 with SMTP id in15mr361333qcb.279.1292563018662; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:16:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (anonymizer3.torservers.net [174.36.199.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20sm614779qck.36.2010.12.16.21.16.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:16:58 -0800 (PST) From: Anonymous To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:16:49 +0300 Message-ID: <867hf9ashq.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: idle priority > 30 in top(1) and idprio > 31 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:16:59 -0000 Is the following a regression? $ uname -vm FreeBSD 9.0-HEAD-20101216-JPSNAP #0: Thu Dec 16 07:13:24 UTC 2010 root@build-amd64-fbsd.allbsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 $ yes >/dev/null & $ idprio 31 -$(pgrep yes) $ top PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 2139 luser 1 117 i-23 10052K 1128K RUN 0:41 98.97% yes $ idprio 444 -$(pgrep yes) $ top PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 2139 luser 1 117 i-102 10052K 1128K RUN 0:42 97.56% yes On 8.0-RELEASE it's different $ yes >/dev/null & $ idprio 31 -$(pgrep yes) $ top PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 2653 luser 1 171 i31 5808K 596K RUN 0:10 97.88% yes $ idprio 444 -$(pgrep yes) idprio: idprio: Invalid argument - 8.1-RELEASE accepts idprio > 31, e.g. 444. - 8.2-BETA1 shows negative values in top(1) like -CURRENT