Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Apr 96 14:25:53 MET DST
From:      Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de>
To:        gjennejohn@frt.dec.com
Cc:        lehey.pad%sni.de@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com, questions%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com, hackers%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com, isdn%muc.ditec.de@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com
Subject:   Re: Internal ISDN Cards
Message-ID:  <199604021110.NAA25344@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de>
In-Reply-To: <9604021206.AA25677@cssmuc.frt.dec.com>; from "garyj@frt.dec.com" at Apr 02, 96 2:06 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> lehey.pad@sni.de writes:
>>> Does anyone know of an internal ISDN card that mimics a COM port (as
>>> modems do) ?
>>
>> We've been through quite a lengthy discussion of this point in hackers
>> and the ISDN list recently.  The result was that the Germans didn't
>> think much of the modem-style TAs (and the Americans did).  I won't
>> bore people with my reasons again, but basically dedicated ISDN boards
>> are cheaper, faster and more reliable.  On the down side, we still
>> need to get the software up to scratch.
>>
>
> he wrote *internal* there, Greg. Not an external modem-like ISDN
> fubar.

Sure, an internal modem-like ISDN fubar.  I did see that, but I don't
see that it makes much difference.

But I promised not to start up this thread again.

Greg




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604021110.NAA25344>