From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu May 6 11:00:07 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86B95FBE0D for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 11:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oshogbo.vx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com (mail-lf1-f50.google.com [209.85.167.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbVwR1k7hz4YS2 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 11:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oshogbo.vx@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id z9so7136978lfu.8 for ; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:00:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mL46t/iyb8gWjzWnNJc4vfO5DzLERNiOhJojNVasAyY=; b=FwgWtxTvzAvA9E0SyXkR+BZjT+H2g825oa1SzrjqpIFtF1ftBgGicdnluVUCa+Rt3h xrRFrTwkU8aNWZ700HY+kIxKwHldgoCrrUM4nOL3gtUn2epz/XqxmhFrLcMgZY7uYPiL PSZwYYYBg3yMKTi/Y5cGLS9SPsyFLlMSQ5c1O9IX/5NHqFWuwutuP5Gx9zbiOVRmzsEc aEKYQgg/YOO9iPcDpSmGErZD1byklLIotFpxKoeR1UVNAqkbes1YJT1IugPniG6Jrt3w VsV5Axi+9eULTTwyTdEUibQVS2du04hcZmZwnvsWY3ooQv7rXD58d7wjrjwFbPtos/hG EYOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LSpydoCa6yPj7a/tuuhUVOlkfSw7GdTsadTc5k43nrqUGQm4S 2aBBuboF2DKjB7pRTZYKCco+6x+YTxv0Y3uzOMxUtbOYb20= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzI2+En7gBB3erCCE4jwYaqB1faPUkFCifj5XnRb3p84q+BqRBQkDvyb4JtC0uLWfG2jcMPGghJUqQOB9ZG4U8= X-Received: by 2002:a19:6a06:: with SMTP id u6mr2412346lfu.322.1620298805154; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:00:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mariusz Zaborski Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 12:59:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tail(1) broken in 13-stable To: Peter Jeremy Cc: FreeBSD-Stable ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbVwR1k7hz4YS2 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of oshogbovx@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=oshogbovx@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.35 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.35)[-0.348]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[oshogbo@freebsd.org,oshogbovx@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[209.85.167.50:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[oshogbo@freebsd.org,oshogbovx@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[209.85.167.50:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.167.50:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.167.50:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:00:08 -0000 Could you provide details how to reproduce this? On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 12:13, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-stable wrote: > > Since updating from 12-stable to 13-stable, I've found that tail(1) > crashes, reporting: > Assertion failed: (procfd > STDERR_FILENO), function service_clean, file /usr/src/lib/libcasper/libcasper/service.c, line 394. > tail: unable to init casper: Socket is not connected > unless all three of stdin, stdout and stderr are open. Whilst it > probably doesn't make sense to call tail without stdout open. there's > no obvious reason to require that stdin or stderr must be open. > > -- > Peter Jeremy