From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Jan 31 14:37:40 1997
Return-Path: <owner-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA16477
          for stable-outgoing; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:37:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bofh.noc.best.net (rone@bofh.noc.best.net [205.149.163.54])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA16469
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:37:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rone@localhost) by bofh.noc.best.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id OAA16398 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:37:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Ron Echeverri <rone@bofh.noc.best.net>
Message-Id: <199701312237.OAA16398@bofh.noc.best.net>
Subject: Re: sendmail 8.8.5
In-Reply-To: <199701312201.OAA09926@kachina.jetcafe.org> from Dave Hayes at "Jan 31, 97 02:01:16 pm"
To: stable@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:37:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Dave Hayes writes:
  Hear hear. In fact, abstracting even further, is there any way to do
  this with arbitrary packages (like PERL5, Tk, etc.) so that one has
  the option of NOT installing the outdated versions of stuff in the
  "packages" collection? 

How about keeping up with ports-current with cvsup?  
  
rone
-- 
 Ron Echeverri         Best Internet Usenet Administration        rone@best.net
  ============================================================================
                         All bribes cheerfully accepted.