Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 11:13:44 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Francisco Reyes" <reyesf@super.zippo.com> Cc: "FreeBSD WWW List" <www@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why Japanese translation in sources and not others? Message-ID: <26688.882299624@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Dec 1997 07:35:00 -0400." <199712161235.EAA25690@super.zippo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Which hasn't been integrated? The Japanese translation or the others? The others. > If the answer is the "others", why do we want them all to be > "integrated"? My rationale is that since they are not hosted on the > same computers (am I mistaken?) and the people working on them are You're mistaken. :-) > probably going to be different why not have them separate? Because then they don't get any of the benefits of using CVS to maintain the pages. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26688.882299624>