From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 5 23:37:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0842316A403 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ekgermann@cctec.com) Received: from mx2.cctec.net (69-88-194-252.thewavz.com [69.88.194.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC35743CA5 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:36:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ekgermann@cctec.com) Received: by mx2.cctec.net (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E5782490E; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:37:34 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-RemoteHost: localhost.cctec.com X-Spam-RemoteIP: 127.0.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on cctvw01.cctec.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=ham X-Spam-ShortStat: NO Received: from localhost (localhost.cctec.com [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.cctec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B4E4106; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:37:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx2.cctec.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cctvw01.cctec.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48804-10; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:37:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from EKGLAPTOPCC (unknown [172.28.0.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.cctec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E064138; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:37:21 -0500 (EST) From: "Eric Germann" To: "'Juraj Lutter'" Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:37:15 -0500 Message-ID: <004001c718c6$4bebbc00$79001cac@EKGLAPTOPCC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AccXj/FV0fN0uSiVTuOIf/p/bVjUBQBNki/w X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cctec.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Updating a server with Vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:37:32 -0000 What would you then suggest as a replacement for Vinum for SW raid? -----Original Message----- From: Juraj Lutter [mailto:wilbury@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 5:35 AM To: Eric Germann Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating a server with Vinum On 12/4/06, Eric Germann wrote: > My question is this: If I bring it up into the 6.x train of either > -STABLE or -CURRENT, will the new vinum drivers recognize the old > config written to the drives? Of course backup is important, but just > curious how it would handle this. It would be nice not to have to recreate it and restore it. I'd suggest to get rid of vinum. otis -- Sincerely yours, Juraj Lutter