Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Apr 1998 21:25:31 +0200
From:      Stefan `Sec` Zehl <sec@42.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: reducing checksum check...
Message-ID:  <19980430212531.B24281@matrix.42.org>
In-Reply-To: <199804300310.UAA13183@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 08:10:40PM -0700
References:  <19980429181632.42978@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> <199804300310.UAA13183@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 08:10:40PM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote:
> You should just type "make install" or "make package" depending on
> what you are trying to do.  All the ports' make rules are chained and
> are not really designed to be called separately.

Hm. I don't agree in this point. I often just do an "make" or "make
patch" to be able to change some small detail i don't like about that
particular port (one example: I always increase MAXWIN in the screen
port from 10 to 30). Then i can proceed via an "make install".

So i think this change (checking checksum only once) is worthwhile.

Just doing it if 'work/.extract_done' doesn't exist shounds quite
foolproof, too.

CU,
    Sec
-- 
Eine anständige Katze trinkt keinen Whisky, davon kriegt sie ja nen Kater.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980430212531.B24281>