From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 18 19:18:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D085D16A403 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968D543D6B for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:18:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 19FE42FD8; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:18:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:18:18 -0500 To: crs@swcp.com Message-ID: <20061018191818.GA20425@soaustin.net> References: <200610181906.k9IJ6Ai4091879@sorsby.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610181906.k9IJ6Ai4091879@sorsby.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: compat3x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:18:18 -0000 On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:06:10PM -0600, Charlie Sorsby wrote: > What does this mean and why is it so? > > Wednesday, 18 Oct, 2006 -- 12:59:41 MDT > ===> compat3x-i386-4.4.20020925 is forbidden: FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr, FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath - not fixed / no lib available. It means there is no feasible way to write a secure version of antique software and do the necessary regression testing to guarantee that it is so. > While I can understand lack of support for old versions of the OS, > I cannot understand nor can I fail to resent y'all's making its use > impossible. It's not impossible. Comment out the line and install it, but understand that by doing so you now have a vulnerable system. > Perhaps if y'all were not so intent upon making free"BSD" less and > less BSD and more and more "invented here" such problems would be > less common. BSD ran on VAXen and the like. FreeBSD runs on dual-core processors with power management, wireless networks, disks that were larger than the BSD designers thought possible via quantum physics (I have this first-hand), and gigabit networks; all on processor architectures that did not exist (in anything close to their current form) back in the halcyon days. So, we get it either way: if we attempt to bring in new features, we are criticized for trying to invent new solutions; if we attempt to stay where we are, we suddenly find we don't run on any hardware that anyone actually cares about anymore. Given this, we do our best to generate consensus about what most people are interested in working on and maintaining, and go from there. btw, we don't support Mosaic in the Ports Collection, either, for exactly the same reason. I removed it myself. It was a great piece of software for its time. That time passed. mcl