Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:25:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> To: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPSEC tunnels Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604102225010.43796@laptop.wojtek.intra> In-Reply-To: <CALfReydUCVg7A7ngS1vBHkCMOqgBOpddcn5JyfMUaWnWfqJhrg@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604080749020.4250@laptop.wojtek.intra> <CALfReydUCVg7A7ngS1vBHkCMOqgBOpddcn5JyfMUaWnWfqJhrg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> dealing with layer 3 so you cant use normal port forwarding for the tunnel > traffic. The key exchange is less problematic. It was a bit of a head ache, > and if you can avoid the NAT you will be far better off. If i can avoid NAT i would use available FreeBSD IPSEC tunnel guides :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1604102225010.43796>