From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 3 22:25:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511CD37B401 for ; Sat, 3 May 2003 22:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F6743F85 for ; Sat, 3 May 2003 22:25:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h445PUA7034558; Sat, 3 May 2003 23:25:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 23:25:03 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030503.232503.12728218.imp@bsdimp.com> To: pmarquis@pobox.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200304291501.02430.pmarquis@pobox.com> References: <20030429143841.GA5828@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <200304291501.02430.pmarquis@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in g++ 2.95.4 (Pointer to member functions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 05:25:33 -0000 In message: <200304291501.02430.pmarquis@pobox.com> Paul Marquis writes: : I think your public methods for the class Class should be static. No need. He's using member function pointers, and an object, so the code looks right to my eye. Warner