From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 30 19:51:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DCB287 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from remote.thehowies.com (50-197-91-217-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.197.91.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "remote.thehowies.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8101A1474 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a]) by PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a%24]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:50:06 -0700 From: John Howie To: Matthew Seaman CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: minor syslog issue Thread-Topic: minor syslog issue Thread-Index: AQHQg0NFQpcCH2qyzkOk8TKcKWpS5Z1l/OwAgAAFGwCAAAe0gIAABb4AgAAQWoD//9dcBg== Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:50:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <55422366.8060000@hiwaay.net> <554229CE.30009@infracaninophile.co.uk> <55422E43.8090206@hiwaay.net> <5542348D.8000109@infracaninophile.co.uk> <5542398B.4000405@hiwaay.net>,<55424715.3080607@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <55424715.3080607@infracaninophile.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:51:19 -0000 A little OT but do you really want the RPI to be your time server? It has n= o hardware clock. The time keeping will be (relatively) terrible. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:16, Matthew Seaman wrote: >=20 >> On 2015/04/30 15:17, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> I missed that (high port #, thought it might be a process #, *new* to >> tcpdump et al :-/ ) .... Could that be a mal/mis-configuration in the >> (rather beta) NetBSD ARM port ? I will try the updated syslogd flag & >> see how that goes. Thanks :-). >=20 > Dunno. FreeBSD syslogd sends /from/ port 514 as well as to port 514 -- > which is the traditional behaviour from way back when... of a lot of UDP > based services. NTP still does this, DNS used to do that until > Kaminsky, and now it most definitely *doesn't* do that. More recent > code tends to just use arbitrary ports on the sending side -- I believe > rsyslog (which is the Linux standard) works like that. No idea how > NetBSD behaves. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20