From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 09:18:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7148106564A; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690928FC1C; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.25] (helo=15.mx.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1NvSAJ-0007Kf-9y; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:18:47 +0100 Received: from p57ae0231.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.2.49]:20840 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 15.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1NvSAJ-0002A5-3A; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:18:47 +0100 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:18:46 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20100327101846.5b4d6b18@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100326.102344.364422370204095721.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20100326101524.15695bisy2324t8g@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100326.093717.857133809997909007.imp@bsdimp.com> <20100326171241.16524bklcroedou8@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100326.102344.364422370204095721.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander@Leidinger.net, rwatson@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTF patch for testing/review X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:18:51 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:23:44 -0600 (MDT) "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > In message: <20100326171241.16524bklcroedou8@webmail.leidinger.net> > Alexander Leidinger writes: [entry in build(7)] > : I will have a look at it next week. As I'm not a native english > : speaker, you can expect another patch for review (text suggestions for > : build.9 are welcome, I will take care about the mdoc markup then). > Note, it's build(7), not build(9). At least, I find no build(9) on my -current system installed two days ago. > How does this text look (posted so everybody can kibitz): > > WITH_CTF the build process will run the DTrace CTF conversion > tools on built objects. Please note that this WITH_ > option is handled differently than all other WITH_ > options (there's no WITHOUT_CTF, or corresponding ==> there is - no contractions, please > MK_CTF in the build system). > Otherwise it looks OK to me. -- Gary Jennejohn