From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 5 14:35:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC53E16A541; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389AE43D7B; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:35:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.62]) by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EE4244C29; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:35:23 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <44FD8B2B.60501@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:35:23 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060730) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <44B67340.1080405@freebsd.org> <44B74036.6060101@freebsd.org> <20060903170129.GA98917@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060903172033.GA99212@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060904184717.GA41475@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060904184717.GA41475@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Shift_JIS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-16 release, it is ready for the merge X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:35:31 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:20:33PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:01:29PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:56:54PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: >>>> Daichi GOTO wrote: >>>>> Patchset-16: >>>>> For 7-current >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p16.diff >>>>> >>>>> For 6.x >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p16.diff >>>> I'm sorry, how silly of me. I updated miss edited things. >>>> I updated correct things now. Please check it :) >>> Dear Goto-san, >>> >>> The panic I was previously seeing (with chrooting into the unionfs) >>> appears to be fixed, but after a bit of load I got the following >>> locking assertion on a unionfs (default mount options) stacked over a >>> nullfs mount of a local ufs filesystem: >> I got the same panic from a mount_unionfs -b mount with no nullfs >> involved. > > Another panic from mount_unionfs -b when just running 'vi' on a file. > By the way, I recommend you run with DEBUG_LOCKS and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS > if you're not already doing so, because it looks like there are still > a number of locking problems. Oops ;-X Yeah, we have a new patchset to solve above problem I think. -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi