Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 04:22:11 -0800 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG> To: jared nied <jnied@southampton.liu.edu> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OS X vs. Darwin Message-ID: <20030308042211.L79531@freebsdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <3464BCFE-4FD2-11D7-A6E7-000393BB8320@southampton.liu.edu>; from jnied@southampton.liu.edu on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:50:27AM -0500 References: <3464BCFE-4FD2-11D7-A6E7-000393BB8320@southampton.liu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:50:27AM -0500, jared nied wrote: > You say in 'Explaining BSD' that OS X is a closed-source BSD, with only= =20 > the kernel open-sourced. Darwin is an entirely functional BSD OS for=20 > x86 and PPCs=20 > (http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/darwin/faq.html); the=20 > Aqua/Quartz graphics system is closed-source. I'm just curious why you= =20 > don't make that distinction; do you have problems with the APSL as well= =20 > (I don't mean that the way it sounds..)? No, this is an oversight. The text in that article should be corrected. - Murray --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE+aeBytNcQog5FH30RAv5MAKCpD1L+T+VVYbJ7ctsLLHp5HwifRQCfYgFD 7XnpzM/QoYH9Pt3Nf97KRxw= =qWdQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030308042211.L79531>