Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:30:16 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Style(9) clarification: c99 initializers Message-ID: <CANCZdfpB80iTiRGbibaZtM2UZ88_kg7uL_ir6UuLshOgAr-WEQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfpz3NtN=4W4TzJAEE-Suje8Fm1d5Eqto5NiA==_fkU_uQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfpz3NtN=4W4TzJAEE-Suje8Fm1d5Eqto5NiA==_fkU_uQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've opened https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13975 for this. Warner On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > I'd like to make the following change to style(9) to codify the current > momentum towards using c99 designated initializers where it makes sense: > > diff --git a/share/man/man9/style.9 b/share/man/man9/style.9 > index f008a7d613e..75dba71830f 100644 > --- a/share/man/man9/style.9 > +++ b/share/man/man9/style.9 > @@ -324,6 +324,10 @@ Userspace code should include > while kernel code should include > .In sys/types.h . > .Pp > +Likewise, the project is moving to using the > +.St -isoC-99 > +designated initializers when it makes sense to do so. > +.Pp > Enumeration values are all uppercase. > .Bd -literal > enum enumtype { ONE, TWO } et; > > Comments? > > Warner >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfpB80iTiRGbibaZtM2UZ88_kg7uL_ir6UuLshOgAr-WEQ>