Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:28:25 -0700 From: javocado <javocado@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Optimizing performance with SLOG/L2ARC Message-ID: <CAP1HOmTidC3%2BG4XfhvkQxieo%2BSYMq-JWiXF9Cs4FSW2VqkktWA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
I've been trying to optimize and enhance my ZFS filesystem performance
(running FreeBSD 8.3amd) which has been sluggish at times. Thus far I have
added RAM (256GB) and I've added an SLOG (SSD mirror). The RAM seems to
have helped a bit, but not sure if the SLOG was of much help. My vdev is
decently busy, with writes and reads averaging at 100 per second with
spikes as high as 500.
Here's what arc_statistics is showing me:
ARC Size: 70.28% 173.89 GiB
Target Size: (Adaptive) 71.84% 177.77 GiB
Min Size (Hard Limit): 12.50% 30.93 GiB
Max Size (High Water): 8:1 247.44 GiB
ARC Efficiency: 2.25b
Cache Hit Ratio: 95.76% 2.16b
Cache Miss Ratio: 4.24% 95.55m
Actual Hit Ratio: 64.95% 1.46b
Data Demand Efficiency: 94.83% 330.99m
Data Prefetch Efficiency: 26.36% 64.23m
CACHE HITS BY CACHE LIST:
Anonymously Used: 30.87% 665.74m
Most Recently Used: 7.54% 162.67m
Most Frequently Used: 60.29% 1.30b
Most Recently Used Ghost: 0.18% 3.97m
Most Frequently Used Ghost: 1.11% 23.89m
CACHE HITS BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 14.56% 313.89m
Prefetch Data: 0.79% 16.93m
Demand Metadata: 53.28% 1.15b
Prefetch Metadata: 31.38% 676.68m
CACHE MISSES BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 17.90% 17.10m
Prefetch Data: 49.50% 47.30m
Demand Metadata: 24.46% 23.37m
Prefetch Metadata: 8.14% 7.78m
1. based on the output above, I believe a larger ARC may not necessarily
benefit me at this point. True?
2. Is more (L2)ARC always better?
3. I know it's a good idea to mirror the SLOG (and I have). Do I understand
correctly that I do not need to mirror the L2ARC since it's just a read
cache, nothing to lose if the SSD goes down?
4. Is there a better way than looking at zpool iostat -v to determine the
SLOG utilization and usefulness?
I'd like to test-see if adding L2ARC yields any performance boost. Since
SLOG isn't doing much for me, I'm thinking I could easily repurpose my SLOG
into an L2ARC.
Questions:
5. In testing, it seemed fine to remove the SLOG from a live/running system
(zpool remove pool mirror-3). Is this in fact a safe thing to do to a
live/running system? ZFS knows that it should flush the ZIL, then remove
the device? Is it better or necessary to shut down the system and remove
the SLOG in "read only" mode?
6. Am I missing something about how the SLOG and L2ARC play together that I
would miss by running my proposed test. i.e. if I take down the SLOG and
repurpose as an L2ARC might I be shooting myself in the foot cause the SLOG
and L2ARC combo is much more powerful than the L2ARC alone (or SLOG alone)?
My hope here is to see if the L2ARC improves performance, after which I
will proceed with buying the SSD(s) for both the SLOG and L2ARC.
Thanks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAP1HOmTidC3%2BG4XfhvkQxieo%2BSYMq-JWiXF9Cs4FSW2VqkktWA>