From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:05:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9B5106566C; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7490D8FC0C; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DK55hV011087; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:05:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5DK55X8011084; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:05:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:05:05 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Sean Bruno In-Reply-To: <1339610792.2878.5.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <1338922510.10539.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <1338930799.10539.12.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <1339531057.42366.2.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <20120613.120600.2188772873180778735.hrs@allbsd.org> <1339610792.2878.5.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:05:05 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: est man page X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:05:12 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Sean Bruno wrote: > >> se> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/est_man.txt >> >> Looks good. Attached a diff for some small fixes. > > Updated again with feedback that I've gotten. > > I changed the "Note that est interface is automatically loaded" to "Note > that est capabilities are automatically loaded" The only remaining problem I see is .Sh COMPATIBILITY .Nm is only found on supported Intel CPUs. est(4) is not on the supported CPUs, but EST, the feature that est(4) uses. Does "supported" mean "supported by est(4)" or "supported by the CPU"? Maybe Enhanced Speedstep Technology is supported by many Intel CPUs.