Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Apr 1998 07:32:28 -0400
From:      Malartre <malartre@aei.ca>
To:        freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Simple End-User FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <353F26CC.5FE9084@aei.ca>
References:  <3.0.1.32.19980422202643.006aa1b8@pacificnet.net> <3.0.1.32.19980422205623.0069668c@pacificnet.net> <353F25B7.2D0B8739@aei.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joey Garcia wrote:

> At 11:40 PM 4/22/98 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> >Its true but impossible.
> >Win95 do the job for GUI, even if its cheap and buggy.
> >I can reply "Buy a Mac"
> >It will be as Unix, but without a lot of trouble.
> >
> >BeOS seems to be the long term solution.  I dont think than FreeBSD will
> one day
> >be a user-friendly.
> >
> >Malartre
> >
> Yeah, I do realize that FreeBSD being Unix it's not a total GUI machine.
> For Unix to be GUI, it needs X.  And X is pretty much a third party
> software thing.  Sort of like how Windows 3.1 and DOS were.  You know what
> I mean?  Anyways, DOS wasn't all that hard to figure out.  But then again,
> it really didn't do anything.  FreeBSD has pretty much everything you can
> want (networking, stable kernel, awesome memory management, etc) and more.
> Basically, everything that DOS never had.
>
> Anyways, for a long time people used DOS without a GUI.  I'm pretty sure
> they can do it again...but in the form of FreeBSD. Know what I mean?
> Basically, make FreeBSD so friendly that a simple DOS user can figure it
> out.  That's the point where I'm heading.
>
> In order to make FreeBSD like windows, X would need to be
> incorporated...and that would be a hella headache.  With all the video
> cards and stuff.  Personally, I'd like to run Accelerated X when I get my
> FreeBSD box up and running, and I don't want XFree86 pushed on to me.  (I
> know, I know - with FreeBSD you can pick and choose how you want set up,
> with XFree86 or not - just trying to imaging how it would be if XFree86 was
> pushed in order to make it a user friendly GUI enviroment - know what I
> mean, Vern?) =P
>
> Comments?  :)
>
> Joey Garcia

:-)Well, ask you "why Dos is so easy"
Because you cannot do anything.
And because all is configured and because no one have to choice something.

Ok, Under FreeBSD, you should always need of a good MS-Words-like apps.
So under Dos, all user know where is the application Words.
Under FreeBSD, I dont even know how Latex work and if I can take SCO
WordPerfect.

Its because FreeBSD is to-much configurable. Dos is for Dummies and I think its
a good thing in some way.

Malartre
Comments?  :-)
--
--------------------------------------------------
malartre@aei.ca         ICQ #4224434
www.aei.ca/~malartre/   FreeBSD 4 Newbies project
Windows_95-B            Unix FreeBSD-2.2.5
--------------------------------------------------


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?353F26CC.5FE9084>