From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan  5 22:26:54 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58C8153A5
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Jan 2000 22:26:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA50599;
	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 22:26:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: "John W. DeBoskey" <jwd@unx.sas.com>
Cc: Arjan de Vet <Arjan.deVet@adv.iae.nl>,
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Quattlebaum <sasdrq@unx.sas.com>
Subject: Re: AIO was Re: Kernel threads 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jan 2000 01:11:53 EST."
             <200001060611.BAA49055@bb01f39.unx.sas.com> 
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 22:26:46 -0800
Message-ID: <50594.947140006@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This is very interesting data and I was just wondering about the
actual state of functionality in our AIO code just the other day,
oddly enough.  Does anyone have a PR# for the mentioned patches?

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message