From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 20:30:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD14116A404 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (203-109-251-39.static.bliink.ihug.co.nz [203.109.251.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634AF13C4BD for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: by heff.fud.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B62441CC58; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:30:26 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:30:26 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson To: Stefan Lambrev Message-ID: <20070316203026.GA2312@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <45FA6ADD.1090608@sun-fish.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45FA6ADD.1090608@sun-fish.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: if_bridge & pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:30:28 -0000 On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:01:01PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 firewalls, and every of them have 2 bridged interfaces + STP , > running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE > Unfortunately one of them is totally dead (hw problems) and I have to > make new one, but I plan to use > FreeBSD-6.2-STABLE. > > My question is are there any know compatibility issues between 6.1 and > 6.2? I know that > a lot of changes are committed to if_bridge and pf/pfsync, that's why > I'm little unsure :) For if_bridge there were over a dozen commits, half were new feaures and the other half bugfixes. I do not know of any compatibility issues. The main one for you to test would be the addition of RSTP which was a large overhaul of the existing code. The default protocol is still STP and should be no different for you. Andrew