From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr 26  1:28:53 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8FC14FDF
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 01:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au)
Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spinner.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 40A571F5C; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:28:42 +0800 (WST)
	(envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: chris@calldei.com
Cc: A.Leidinger@Wurzelausix.CS.Uni-SB.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: config & NO_F00F_HACK 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 25 Apr 1999 17:26:59 EST."
             <19990425172657.A422@holly.dyndns.org> 
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:28:42 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Message-Id: <19990426082847.40A571F5C@spinner.netplex.com.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Chris Costello wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 25, 1999, A.Leidinger@Wurzelausix.CS.Uni-SB.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > # ident LINT
> > LINT:
> >      $Id: LINT,v 1.589 1999/04/24 21:45:44 peter Exp $
> >=20
> > with:
> > option NO_F00F_HACK
> >=20
> > # config WORK
> > WORK:15: unknown option "NO_F0F_HACK"
>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
>    You made a typo.

No, it is a parsing/stringification botch.  It's parsed like this:

ID:		NO_F
NUMBER:		00	(octal 0)
ID:		F_HACK

Of course, an atoi of "00" and then a sprintf("%d") results in a single "0".

I've fixed this here and will commit it shortly, but I'm a bit nervous about
the scope of the change required to prevent this information loss. :-/  I
don't know enough lex/yacc to do context-sensitive tokenization.

Cheers,
-Peter



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message