From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 01:11:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9A116A4CE; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE73143D2D; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:11:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2G9GBee035648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:16:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i2G9Brol098604; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:11:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:11:53 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040316091153.GG97962@ip.net.ua> References: <200403160024.i2G0OssC029519@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040316084538.GB97962@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/tinderbox/etc current.rc X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:11:54 -0000 --j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:53:33AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > Can successful building with -O2 guarantee that the -O build would > > also be successful? >=20 > I believe so, but -O0 is a different story. >=20 Some kernel configs aren't even compilable with -O0 (see the recent ip_output.c commit for one example). Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAVsTZUkv4P6juNwoRAtn2AJsFOXmYSj1w90zTFy4okx591QSwAACgitiv VQqfMwk4fSvH8ivuM1W8R0w= =Aj5Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ--