From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 10:46:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E25461; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from exprod6og114.obsmtp.com (exprod6og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A22B0114F; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob114.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKU0PTbtv42f0TFJ0nXAFbUevxcfHzT0UO@postini.com; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 03:46:14 PDT Received: from DUL1WNSMTP01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (dul1wnexcn03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.113]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s38Ak2vi030221; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 06:46:06 -0400 Received: from FRI2JCHARBON-M1.local ([10.100.64.29]) by DUL1WNSMTP01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 06:46:02 -0400 Message-ID: <5343D368.6020308@verisign.com> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:46:00 +0200 From: Julien Charbon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: panic in -HEAD multicast code References: <53426EE6.5020409@verisign.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2014 10:46:02.0783 (UTC) FILETIME=[BC6FCAF0:01CF5317] Cc: FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:46:15 -0000 Hi Adrian, On 08/04/14 10:25, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hm, how's this happening here? I'm not detaching the interface. Hm, if your are positive that nothing is detaching the interface on your behalf (like a /etc/rc.d/netif restart somewhere), then it looks like you got an unrelated case that just drives the same stacktrace than the race condition we found. -- Julien