From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 16:56:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4925916A41F for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: from smtp.ufficiopostale.it (servizi.interazioni.it [194.183.4.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E75C43D49 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:56:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: (qmail 87450 invoked by uid 85); 1 Sep 2005 16:56:20 -0000 Received: from tonix@interazioni.it by avsmtp.ufficiopostale.it by uid 88 with qmail-scanner-1.12 (nod32: 1.1207 (20050831)/. Clear:. Processed in 0.152431 secs); 01 Sep 2005 16:56:20 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: tonix@interazioni.it via avsmtp.ufficiopostale.it X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.12 (Clear:. Processed in 0.152431 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO IATonino.interazioni.it) (tonix@interazioni.it@213.233.2.94) by relay.interazioni.net with SMTP; 1 Sep 2005 16:56:19 -0000 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20050901175524.053e60c0@pop.ufficiopostale.it> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:56:18 +0100 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" In-Reply-To: <43172EC8.1010205@samsco.org> References: <6.2.3.4.0.20050901172618.0532ecb0@pop.ufficiopostale.it> <43172EC8.1010205@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: camcontrol and IDAD0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 16:56:22 -0000 Thanks Scott. So are they an emulation of ATA devices? Also atacontrol doesn't report anything about them. Tonino At 17.39 01/09/2005, Scott Long wrote: >The IDA devices are not under the CAM subsystem, so camcontrol will >have no effect on them. I assume that you are looking for a way to >monitor and manage the controller and arrays? That requires a >custom application that knows how to speak to the controller firmware. Even >if IDA were under CAM, camcontrol would not be able to do this. > >Scott > >Antonio Nati - Inter@zioni wrote: >>How can I handle Compaq Smart Raid disks using camcontrol? >>I've looked a lot around, and found sometimes the same question, >>but no answers: >>I've an internal Smart Raid card (on a DL360) handling a mirrored >>set of disks. >>Boot says: >>Aug 5 21:23:13 ia-srv01 kernel: idad0: on ida0 >>Aug 5 21:23:13 ia-srv01 kernel: idad0: 17359MB (35553120 sectors), >>blocksize=512 >>RAID is working properly, but I have no way (apparently) to check >>it within FreeBSD. >>Command "camcontrol devlist -v" returns >>scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: >>< > at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) >>atacontrol does not says anything about this disk. >>What can I do? Is there any other resource/command available in >>order to solve this problem? >>Thanks, >>Tonino >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"