From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat Sep 2 13:35: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from c1030098-a.wtrlo1.ia.home.com (c1030098-a.wtrlo1.ia.home.com [24.14.126.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE33D37B42C for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 13:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mdharnois@localhost) by c1030098-a.wtrlo1.ia.home.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e82KZ2X00692; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 15:35:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mdharnois@home.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mharnois.workgroup.net: mdharnois set sender to mdharnois@home.com using -f To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vmware2 networking question References: From: Michael Harnois Date: 02 Sep 2000 15:35:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: Brian Beattie's message of "Sat, 26 Aug 2000 11:05:06 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: <86og26r0qx.fsf@mharnois.workgroup.net> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.2 (Nike) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 11:05:06 -0700 (PDT), Brian Beattie said: > I have vmware2 running under 4-Stable using host-only > networking. I have seen some trafic indicating that > bridged-networking can be made to work. Is this true? The port maintainer has done some work at enabling vmware2 to use FreeBSD's bridged networking. However, he seems to have fallen off the face of the earth in the last month or so. -- Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA mdharnois@home.com aa0bt@aa0bt.ampr.org If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence. -- Louis Brandeis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message