From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 11 13: 8:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C04137B556 for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 13:08:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bandix@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10519; Thu, 11 May 2000 16:07:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 16:07:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Kevin Way , David Miller , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Server Farms? In-Reply-To: <20000511093918.A4889@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >* Kevin Way [000511 09:26] wrote: >> >>Alfred Perlstein suggested the creation of segmented CVS lists to save >> >>bandwidth and mail spool space. >> >Brandon D. Valentine suggested the use of procmail. >> >> The trouble is that while this does reduce mail spool space, and reduces >> the time it takes to read the appropriate CVS lists, it does not save >> bandwidth. Alfred Perlstein's suggestion would do that quite effectively. > >Er, that's not what I said. I said to use procmail. And I had said to use segmented CVS lists. I think Mr. Way has confused himself. Regardless, I have already withdrawn the suggestion as a duty for the project because others have enlightened me to the issues involved in doing this. Thread's over. Brandon D. Valentine -- bandix@looksharp.net Illegitimi non carborundum. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message