From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 17 11:49:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74449B1; Fri, 17 May 2013 11:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEFE78A; Fri, 17 May 2013 11:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UdJ9Z-0003W0-D7; Fri, 17 May 2013 13:48:54 +0200 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UdJ9X-0007oF-T7; Fri, 17 May 2013 13:48:51 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Boris Astardzhiev" , "Mateusz Guzik" , "Ronald Klop" Subject: Re: NANDFS eats itself up References: <20121128104218.GA17871@dft-labs.eu> <20121128151336.GC17871@dft-labs.eu> <20121129110719.GA26212@dft-labs.eu> <20130103235451.GA31491@dft-labs.eu> Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 13:48:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: + X-Spam-Score: 1.1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40, URI_HEX autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 729ef2e9e2cd27dd49f9ca04774c95e6 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, gjb@semihalf.com, Grzegorz Bernacki , stanislav_galabov@smartcom.bg X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:49:03 -0000 On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:41:11 +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:54:51 +0100, Mateusz Guzik > wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:13:55PM +0200, Boris Astardzhiev wrote: >>> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 05:36:11PM +0200, Boris Astardzhiev wrote: >>> > > If I do that I might be unable to set back the verbose level to 0 >>> since >>> > the >>> > > output is very very NOISY. This means that I will have to start >>> again >>> > from >>> > > the beginning if I need to reproduce it. Nevertheless here you go. >>> Check >>> > > the attachment (OUTPUTNAND.txt.bz2). >>> > > >>> > >>> > I think I reproduced your problem. Possibly I'll have time to work on >>> > this next week, but no promises. >>> > >> >> So, I think I understand what is causing the problem here and will most >> likely have time to work on it this month. >> > > Hi, > > Not to push you or something like that, but did you find the time? > I'm curious to running my SHEEVAPLUG using the NAND memory. > If there is something to test or help in another way, I'm willing to do > that. > > Ronald. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi, This full thread is available here. http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/NANDFS-eats-itself-up-td5764878.html I follow the commits on FreeBSD, but did not see a fix for this. Maybe I missed it. I'm wondering if there is something news about this issue. I understand everybody is very busy, but am curious about it. Regards, Ronald.