From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Feb 21 11:06:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279BEAAF3BC for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7CD1E6B for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1LB6YeV001585 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:06:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206511] 'service -e' generates warnings in /var/log/user.log Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:06:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: p5B2E9A8F@t-online.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:06:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206511 --- Comment #2 from p5B2E9A8F@t-online.de --- >These are the results of various required _enable settings missing (or not= set >to YES or NO) from /etc/defaults/rc.conf and /etc/rc.conf{,.local}. In rc.conf there need to be settings different from default. There is no need for explicit setting "NO" and there should be none. A utility like service should not generate false warnings. This is extremely disturbant because administrators try to hunt down those warnings and start= a time consuming research, as these entries occur by random on the first look= .=20 Warnings in logfiles should not be misleading and they should not be false warnings. If this is true services does a poor job and this is a bug. services uses function checkyesno of /etc/rc.subr which issues the warning = but on different prerequisite. Obviously service needs its own function for its purpose. >The one that doesn't name a setting is particularly worrisome. Well this most probably is caused by the same problem. This is worrisome and points to a buggy implementation of service because it does not reveal the filename of the tested file. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=