Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 23:06:27 -0700 From: Chris <portmaster@bsdforge.com> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: Rene Ladan <portmgr-secretary@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Python 2.7 removal outline Message-ID: <b1677c9444cc54c58dae35d62771eb9b@bsdforge.com> In-Reply-To: <YF1wKLQ8ikIVsUUy@home.opsec.eu> References: <20210324130347.GA29020@freefall.freebsd.org> <ba9b8eb5e0d2c5e0dbdb5a757f594522@bsdforge.com> <YF1wKLQ8ikIVsUUy@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-03-25 22:24, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Why does our work have so little value that portmgr@ is unwilling >> to keep us all in the loop, or consider our opinions on such matters? > > The portmgr@ role is a huge task and all the reasons (limited time, > dayjobs, etc) ares valid for those folks from portmgr as for > the rest of the ports maintainers and committers. Indeed, and don't think that hadn't occurred to me. In fact I suspected that portmgr@ was feeling a bit overwhelmed, and that *that* triggered the seemingly overreaching python announcement. May I humbly request a petition for such large-sweeping changes? IMHO this will give portmgr@ the opportunity to get caught up, and perhaps get some assistance -- maybe we all come up with an idea that saves _everyones_ bacon. :-) Thanks for the thoughtful reply. --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1677c9444cc54c58dae35d62771eb9b>