From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 06:28:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9CF16A4CE; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:28:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1314A43D54; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:28:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAU6S30N065637; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:28:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost)iAU6S3LE065620; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:28:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.chesapeake.net: jroberson owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:28:01 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <200411231140.10041.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20041130012736.A85758@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20041120000743.G18094@mail.chesapeake.net> <20041123083801.GA40401@peter.osted.lan> <200411231140.10041.jhb@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Giantless VFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:28:04 -0000 On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 23 November 2004 03:38 am, Peter Holm wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 12:24:10AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > I have a patch that I would like people to test and review. It's > > > available here: > > > > > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/smpffs.diff > > > > I have a panic at http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/jeff02.html > > with GENERIC HEAD from Nov 22 14:40 UTC + your Giantless VFS patch. > > > > But the fault does not seem to related to your changes? > > Might be an incorrect parameter to mtx_init() that results in a bogus pointer > eventually for the name of a lock? I forgot to call mtx_destroy() before I freed the name. This could have done it eh? > > -- > John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org >