From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 07:22:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CC416A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:22:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1925043D2F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from [192.160.235.2] (cs242743-143.austin.rr.com [24.27.43.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DB914313 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 02:22:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 02:19:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407010219.44628.linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: does FreeBSD still support CPUs without math coprocessors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:22:37 -0000 The FAQ claims that it does, but ISTR recent discussion about removing the software emulation. However, a search of the mailing lists, and Google, fails to show anything, so it is completely possible that my memory is playing tricks on me. If that support has gone by the wayside, I'll go ahead and change that part of the FAQ, oth4erwise, I'll leave it alone. (And yes, I just saw the 386 announcement, so I know about that.) mcl