From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 16 02:29:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7583A16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marsgmiro@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF5443D48 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marsgmiro@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so180666wxc for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:29:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=V8XvYfQIk67FdObbzaGMcmy6WpTlQd3HwroGUOoe9sTsoOwWSWyOCOh3wPdGk/C5CVjqlc/bB87WrnL7Iz+ydXkp6JLDYzI1Kqgv4c4gKsfbFjAR0af5NG+UlKXPAaKqj8yV0C1UOyMGJYoH2U7lNSlLzP8QJi2PYED8nEtfeHc= Received: by 10.70.43.12 with SMTP id q12mr1370403wxq; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.49.6 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:29:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <28edec3c0603151829r7ff125f8m3dfb8c194d0731b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:29:31 +0800 From: "Mars G. Miro" To: daichi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:41:41 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:29:33 -0000 Daichi-san, >I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs. > We've been using an in-house LiveCD toolkit that uses unionfs (where cd9660 is the lower layer) and all I can say is that these patches are very important, at least on =3D> 6.X, otherwise things would just not work. I believe the FreeSBIE folks also went thru the same experience as they also do this (cd9960 lower, unionfs upper). I have tried your p8-patchset diffs for about 2 weeks now and It Works (TM). Will try your p9 diffs soon ;-) Will these diffs remain to be diffs or do people think that these will be integrated into the sources sometime? Thanks! >Patchset-9: > For 7-current > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p9.diff > > For 6.x > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p9.diff > > Changes in unionfs-p9.diff > - Now you can use unionfs with nullfs. To fix the problem, > We fixed the rock-treatment of src/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c > >The documents of those unionfs patches: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ (English) > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese) > >The patchset-9 is important step for merging to FreeBSD 7-current. >You can use improved unionfs and nullfs together. This is a goot step >for all of us. > >Thanks > >-- > Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi cheers mars