From owner-freebsd-ipfw  Wed May 16  8:51:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A12FD37B422; Wed, 16 May 2001 08:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it)
Received: (from luigi@localhost)
	by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA48567;
	Wed, 16 May 2001 17:48:12 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from luigi)
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <200105161548.RAA48567@info.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Limiting per IP
In-Reply-To: <NCBBLBILEPCHLFJAPIIPOELKGEAA.rjmcintire@earthlink.net> from "Riley
 J. McIntire" at "May 16, 2001 08:23:08 am"
To: "Riley J. McIntire" <rjmcintire@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:48:12 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: "Patrick O'Reilly" <patrick@mip.co.za>, ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Holtor <holtor@yahoo.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Luigi,
> 
> It looks like you have a typo here.

it looks you have forgotten the smiley :) in your msg.

If not, then you have a bad font, because O != 0

	cheers
	luigi

> > then everything works pretty fast -- the ruleset is short, and
> > the pipe processing overhead is O(log n) where n is the number of
> > _active_ pipes.
> 
> 0(log n) = 0 is pretty low overhead.
> 
> n(log n) would seem more appropriate if I had to guess.
> 
> Riley
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message