From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 12 00:19:31 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF84106568B
	for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:19:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from astounding@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (mail-qw0-f47.google.com
	[209.85.216.47])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDBD8FC1F
	for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:19:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so4750166qab.13
	for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:19:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; bh=3NGoYNItH+qhdD4uQCpdZI40xNb0mKisv2mQQm7bup8=;
	b=UXBM9dEB7M9RRqnY65rv9YW2Sq8OniWImah8orFJxeiHaksh0m6qYkcMEWhqWZDKGm
	BXf64mUkOOh/lVPDQSNX9upxGrJpcZZGRrIicRASDQ2e/BStbyJgVVk3I3J1OCSxEyj+
	XpadbKpsf2yI3U9klSAwn1I4/+tHP4Zy639ps=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.177.68 with SMTP id bh4mr10496610qab.48.1321055527837;
	Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:52:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.28.141 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:52:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGDxMR4P3TiJkTkk4o=gTW5-Hj6my2bsgc9j6aX=EwanPJ0MNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGDxMR66_1GexKFbN2bu9+-T+rxJ-UHW5WsfLJQvqMG7M=m66A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111111143115.5bf5d195.stas@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAGDxMR4P3TiJkTkk4o=gTW5-Hj6my2bsgc9j6aX=EwanPJ0MNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:52:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGDxMR51-yk0fUOdBUBmEC1ntXS2eA-QEpkS5Ymtp95jf0u7mw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Aaron D. Gifford" <astounding@gmail.com>
To: ruby@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: 
Subject: Re: What changed? (gem command missing in 1.9)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:19:32 -0000

I'm not familiar with the inner workings of FreeBSD's port system, but
is it possible that issues like 'gem' and 'rake' suddenly no longer
being part of the lang/ruby19 port (due to the aforementioned outdated
versions) could be dealt with during some sort of post-install hook
while installing the lang/ruby19 port, a hook that could then install
devel/ruby-gems and devel/rubygem-rake ports so that the executables
that previously were always part of lang/ruby19 will still be
automatically installed with that port?

Speculating,
Aaron out.