From owner-freebsd-net Mon May 7 7: 7:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from relay.rinet.ru (relay.rinet.ru [195.54.192.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E80737B424 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 07:07:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yar@snark.rinet.ru) Received: from snark.rinet.ru (root@snark.rinet.ru [195.54.192.73]) by relay.rinet.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02643 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 18:07:29 +0400 (MSD) X-Envelope-To: Received: (from yar@localhost) by snark.rinet.ru (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f47E7TW34764 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 7 May 2001 18:07:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 18:07:29 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ipfw & ifconfig in rc.network Message-ID: <20010507180729.A34655@snark.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi there, Is there any serious reason to load ipfw rules after configuring network interfaces? IMHO the right way is doing that in the reverse order. Incidentally, IPFilter rules are loaded before starting the interfaces, which leads to inconsistency as well. -- Yar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message