From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Jul 21 15:52:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32E437C168; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:52:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14976; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:52:03 -0700 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:51:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: wilko@freebsd.org Cc: "David O'Brien" , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-20000719-RC#2 In-Reply-To: <20000722002331.B22611@freebie.demon.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, I'd go for a an ES40 too.... On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Mike and I had hoped to use the 4100 to debug this problem. > > > > But it isn't usable yet. > > > > The 4100 is perfectly usable. The issues are entirely in the installer and/or > > the boot blocks. > > Yes, that is what I wrote and experienced myself. > > > > 4100 makes a good release builder once installed via another machine.. > > > > TurboLaser, even with a slower CPU, actually makes a better one. > > And a noisier one ;-) But I'd go for the ES40. > > -- > Wilko Bulte http://www.freebsd.org > wilko@freebsd.org http://www.nlfug.nl > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message