From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 28 01:18:15 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78D41FC;
 Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:18:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B00FF3C;
 Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:18:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id ED77956074; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:18:08 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:18:08 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>
Subject: Re: ARM EABI directions
Message-ID: <20130228011808.GA19595@lonesome.com>
References: <20130227003517.GB7348@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
 <28404C12-67F3-44F0-AB28-02B749472873@bsdimp.com>
 <C8B590D8-70D2-41DB-812B-859C0F20F765@kientzle.com>
 <EE066522-388C-45C4-8DB7-E2C7BBB60D69@bsdimp.com>
 <0435EF00-62B4-4389-BB3A-3351FC522C34@kientzle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0435EF00-62B4-4389-BB3A-3351FC522C34@kientzle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:18:15 -0000

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 09:09:15AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Why?  ARM was Tier 2 for FreeBSD 9.x, and the FreeBSD
> package builds still don't support ARM packages, so I'm
> not convinced that would be a problem.

I had been building arm packages for several months on a loaned system
until the security incident happened.  To my knowledge, none of those
packages or logs have been brought back online.

mcl