From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 21:51:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D88616A4CE for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from sentry.ucr.edu (sentry.ucr.edu [138.23.226.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA37343F93 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:51:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from beyert@cs.ucr.edu) Received: from aeonserv.aeonnet (adsl-66-124-165-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [66.124.165.35]) by sentry.ucr.edu (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id ATH31012 (AUTH tbeye001) for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:51:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:57:37 -0800 From: Timothy Beyer To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031112215737.02dc36b7.beyert@cs.ucr.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031112230705.19301e60.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> References: <20031112184850.0f752d52.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20031112150201.49789572.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> <20031112230705.19301e60.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5-gtk2-20030906 (GTK+ 2.2.4; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: The future of X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 05:51:54 -0000 On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:07:05 -0600 Vulpes Velox wrote: Were you talking about Xouvert? > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:02:01 -0600 > Vulpes Velox wrote: > > > > I personally doubt that this new xserver will amount to much. Especially given > > a major lack of drivers. It could possibly be interesting, but I don't see > > them really going any where fast or at all. I also get the feeling that they > > will probally want to try to be linux centric with it. I personally think a > > module for doing stuff like that would be much more fesable. But from what I > > have heard getting stuff commited to the XFree86 project is a prob. What could > > be done is to take the current XFree86 code and put it in a enviroment where > > things can be more easily added. This would probally be much better since it > > would not mean writing things from scratch and all ready have a nice amount of > > drivers to pull from. > > Whoops, my bad... accidentally got this confused with one of the other projects > going on... > > Yeah, this is one of the few X projects going on that looks like it actually has > possible potential. > > Any ways, sorry for that bit and any confusion it cuased. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"