From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Mar 12 13:24:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA18114
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 13:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA18107
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 13:24:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA06574; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 14:14:32 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199603122114.OAA06574@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: finger and 2.2-960303-SNAP
To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 14:14:31 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, adf@fl.net.au, olah@cs.utwente.nl, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199603112249.XAA20680@keltia.freenix.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Mar 11, 96 11:49:52 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > "Fixed" is subjective.  It saves one response packet and loses
> > interoperability.  8-(.
> 
> Only with broken TCP implementations like  the Annex's. We'll never see the
> broken code change if no one complain and make them fix their bugs.

This is a wonderful theory.

To make it work, wouldn't the bug reports have to go to their lists
instead of ours?

8-|.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.